I think the problem with British industry was that at the beginning of the 70's, it basically had to decide between massive reinvestment (e.g. suppressing profits, dividends and wages) or running itself into the ground to squeeze out whatever profitability remained.
And it chose the latter, I think largely because unlike say the Germans in the 90's where they nationally disciplined themselves in order to absorb the costs of reunification, British people don't believe in making sacrifices in peacetime.
I think this is part of the underlying reason for the industrial unrest, which seemed to break out randomly and irrationally - really everybody deep down knew that they had to get as much as they could before it all caved in - both management and workers.
So after that it was up to the financiers to conjure up ways of generating revenue, which they did in spades.
I think it was more following a US-led doctrine. By the time of Ford, the US-based ruling class had taken a lot of knocks, so had more time for cranks like Friedman and Hayek (gurus of the IMF etc). Germany's strategic position in the Cold War gave it more soc-dem leeway IMO.
But that's not to say Britain had no influence on the matter. By the 80s, the Labour party capitulated to Thatcherism's excesses via different ways (including the 'breakway' SDP). The problem remains that anything 'left' in this country still orbits around the labour party in one way or the other. There's some element of not being able/willing to sacrifice (the Miner's strike being a major example) but there's so much international top-down skullduggery with these things that 'the British public' isn't really left with much choice at the end of the day.
2 comments:
I think the problem with British industry was that at the beginning of the 70's, it basically had to decide between massive reinvestment (e.g. suppressing profits, dividends and wages) or running itself into the ground to squeeze out whatever profitability remained.
And it chose the latter, I think largely because unlike say the Germans in the 90's where they nationally disciplined themselves in order to absorb the costs of reunification, British people don't believe in making sacrifices in peacetime.
I think this is part of the underlying reason for the industrial unrest, which seemed to break out randomly and irrationally - really everybody deep down knew that they had to get as much as they could before it all caved in - both management and workers.
So after that it was up to the financiers to conjure up ways of generating revenue, which they did in spades.
I think it was more following a US-led doctrine. By the time of Ford, the US-based ruling class had taken a lot of knocks, so had more time for cranks like Friedman and Hayek (gurus of the IMF etc). Germany's strategic position in the Cold War gave it more soc-dem leeway IMO.
But that's not to say Britain had no influence on the matter. By the 80s, the Labour party capitulated to Thatcherism's excesses via different ways (including the 'breakway' SDP). The problem remains that anything 'left' in this country still orbits around the labour party in one way or the other. There's some element of not being able/willing to sacrifice (the Miner's strike being a major example) but there's so much international top-down skullduggery with these things that 'the British public' isn't really left with much choice at the end of the day.
Post a Comment