The 80s were all about getting pumped up in various ways, it's slightly interesting that the first medical treatments for erectile dysfunction turned up in 1983.
That it was in the 1980s treatment was developed, with phentolamine and papaverine followed by the massive impact that viagra had, possibly with an aging male population in mind, seems significant. Or that the later 80s/early 90s was characterized by sex-killing drugs like E. There may have also been more older male focused movies (City Slickers came out in 1991 shortly after viagra was patented, there were probably more) but that's only speculation.
(Also starring Donald Pleasence as the President of the United States)
Sunday, 14 April 2013
Monday, 8 April 2013
Realm of Dusk

A man, a hunched solitary, is standing at the far end of the long platform, beneath a bank of television screens that play back an idealized version of this necropolis junction: pearly, dim, soft. These pictures have the quality of transmissions from a diving bell in the deepest ocean trench. Eel-grass fronds of morbid light flare from the black hole of the tunnel: an extinct monster's last breath.
Iain Sinclair Downriver
Labels:
Conservative Party,
failing to make sense of the past,
Literature,
Margaret Thatcher,
Neoliberalism
Tuesday, 26 March 2013
Welcome to the Occupation (UK Edition)
"The Government accept the clear conclusions of Lord
Stevens and Judge Cory that there was collusion. I want to reiterate the
Government's apology in the House today. The Government are deeply sorry for
what happened. Despite the clear conclusions of previous investigations and
reports, there is still only limited information in the public domain. That is
why my right honourable friend the Prime Minister and I have committed to
establishing a further process to ensure that the truth is revealed."
Rt Hon Owen Paterson MP (2013), on the role of state
involvement in the murder of Pat Finucane.
“After the publication of the Parker Report in March 1972,
much publicity was given to the government statement that the use of hooding,
the noise machine and the SD process would be 'discontinued', less, much less,
publicity was given to Mr. Heath's statement at the same time that although the
hooding might not be used, he must 'make it plain that interrogation in depth
will continue.'”
John McGuffin, The
Guineapigs (1981).
It is possible to watch a thread
emerging in British film and television in the last decades of the 20th
century articulating a nameless anxiety about Britain’s role in Northern
Ireland. The reaction is an interesting one because it is separate to
conventional worries that Northern Irish terrorism could bleed over into
England (The Long Good Friday), or ‘heart
of darkness’ anxieties about Britain’s imperial presence in a region of alien
strangeness (Harry’s Game). What this
reaction was, expressed most fully in the conspiracy thrillers produced by the
BBC and Channel 4, by two of Britain’s best writers for television, Troy Kennedy
Martin, and Alan Bleasedale, is that Northern Ireland is a testing ground where
practices of experimental torture and coercion can be applied before they are
subjected on the real colonial subjects of the Empire: England and the English.
Edge of Darkness and G.B.H. both deal in a similar reality
where in the 1980s and 1990s a militarised state has emerged within Britain,
governed by elites in the security service and politics. Northern Ireland
represents a zone where this collusion can be see much more clearly than in
Britain, and where the practices of the English establishment results in
paranoia, bloodshed, and hatred.
Edge of Darkness is the story of a police detective who has a
history in the sectarian conflicts of Northern Ireland, and shadowy dealings on
behalf of the security services. Craven’s
job in Northen Ireland was to manage a network of touts, who relayed
information to Craven who himself sent it on to MI6; Craven had a privileged
position within the English machine, he has control over part of the flow of
information and knows that in practice Northern Ireland is closer the India of the
19th century: keep the factions playing off against each other and
they’ll never know who they’re really fighting. Craven is withdrawn however
from Northern Ireland, aware that the network of informers he left behind are
all extremely likely to be uncovered and murdered. Craven is forced to confront
his own role in the empire when one of his informers makes an unexpected
reappearance and murders his daughter before his eyes. The rest of Edge of Darkness is a realisation for
Craven that England, and the rest of the world, is Northern Ireland in
macrocosm: alone he is only one point of contact for something bigger, more
organised, and more ruthless, than anything he could have imagined. If the
establishment (or elites, or empire, or security services, or Americans, or
energy companies; the evil that Craven opposes is so pervasive and protean it
cannot be named or truly understood) wishes to play with the lives of the
natives, then there is perhaps nothing, as Craven discovers, that can be done
to stop them. The forces Craven encounters in the UK are similar to the role he
served in Northern Ireland; he is a missionary amongst heathens, bringing the
gospel and the law to heathens in the manner of Henry Morton Stanley; when his
begins to unravel the conspiracy of the collusion between politics and energy,
he encounters missionaries of a greater gospel than his own, Neoliberalism.
Great Britain has become the last outpost of the British Empire, its people the
empire’s last subjects, and its politics the only game in town for the intelligence
services.
Northern Ireland returns to haunt
the end-of-history setting of G.B.H.,
with a security service plot to overthrow the elected socialist council leader
of a northern city. G.B.H. is a tale
from the end of history because it depicts the world post-apocalypse,
post-1980s, after the great work of Neoliberalism was nearly complete: both
main characters, Murray the socialist councillor, Nelson the old-labour
teacher, are yesterday’s men next to the apolitical security service operators
(you could say managers) who have been dispatched to cause chaos. The security
service characters are incarnated Neoliberalism, cored-out of all real beliefs
(Nelson’s and Murray’s political convictions are wavering, or clouded by
personal ambitions or neuroses, but never allowed to be completely
distinguished), faster, better organized, and better able to shape themselves
to the needs of the job at hand (Neoliberalism demands flexibility and fluidity
of its subjects) , changing roles and accents with ease (Murray and Nelson
maintain their accents through the programme as a mark of their integrity; even
Nelson’s middle class friend changes his accent, softened when attempting to
romance one his students, choppy working class when with Nelson). The Northern
Ireland analogy works well in G.B.H. because
Murray for instance is depicted as being of Irish descent, with the addition
that the Northern city is implied to be Liverpool. The intelligence agents,
when they reveal their real nature, make many comparisons between working in
England and working in Ireland: they are greatly displeasured to be once again
working amongst, as the character Grendel describes them, “heathens.” There is
no concern for England as a place, but as a colonized zone where the
consequences of causing anarchy are summed up by Grendel’s triumphant grin as
he, like Craven, abandons his native dupes (socialist henchmen attacking the
city’s ethnic minorities) to be murdered by a mob of the city’s citizens.
Britain is just somewhere that if you are prepared to submit yourself to the
colonists, you can drive away from.
Northen Ireland today has assumed
a very strange position in British culture. Everybody knows ‘something’ went on
there, but despite this something being periodically fleshed out (the Stalker
Inquiry, the Saville Report, the Pat Finucane review) the public are still
unwilling to probe deeper. The tone taken towards the recent ‘flag riots’ is
very much one of “why, I thought all of this had been sorted out years ago,”
with an added “the fucking peasants”, depending on one’s political
sensibilities. This common-sense approach can be seen applied in the BBC tv
movie Mo: the peace process is simply
a process of getting two silly boys to sit down in front of level-headed but
cookie Julie Walters and “grow a pair.” No death squads, no sensory
deprivation, no collusion with terrorists, not in this account of Northern
Ireland’s recent history (this will also be the definitive account of Iraq and
Afghanistan around 10 years hence). ‘Occupy’ became a buzzword for the
pseudo-socialists and activists a few years ago who organized themselves to
seize territory from their perceived opponents, high finance and corrupt politicians.
With Northern Ireland as an example they could perhaps better glimpse how power
really works in Britain, how little regard the colonists have towards the
colonized, and the brutality that is an everyday fact of the occupation.
Wednesday, 27 February 2013
Mauer Dreamstory Pt.2
(x-posted from Nuits Sans Nuit)
(from the work in progress "Poor But Sexy", see also Pt.1 Drang nach Osten)
“I didnt want that to happen, but it did”
(from the work in progress "Poor But Sexy", see also Pt.1 Drang nach Osten)
“I didnt want that to happen, but it did”
‘A woman who fucks
an octopus’ – that was the way Andrzej Å»uÅ‚awski pitched his 1980 film
Possession to the producer, fresh after the success of his French film L'important c’est d’aimer, about a fallen actress, played by a sad-eyed Romy Schneider, who is made to act in pornographic movies, surrounded by
other failed artists, including an unusually melancholic, tender performance from
Klaus Kinski. He was also right after the fiasco of his three hour long monumental metaphysical SF On a Silver Globe (1978), an adaptation of a fin de siecle experimental futurological novel of his great uncle, Jerzy Żuławski, pulled before completion by the hostile communist ministry of culture and shelved until 1987, when only Zulawski had a chance to "finish" the film. Around that time, he was abandoned by his wife Malgorzata Braunek, actress in his Third part of the night and The Devil, due to his famously domineering and possessive personality as a partner and a director. Left in shock and depression, he started plotting a mysogynist fairy tale about a monster....
The sleep of
reason produces demons, and one of them materialised, when Anna, living in West
Berlin with her functionary nice husband and child in a neat, 3 storeys blocks
estate, realised she despised her husband. She confesses that to him. The rest is what happens after that confession.
Possession was
made in the golden era of the genre of exploitation, and it must be due to the
communal genius that things conceived as forgettable shlock to this day shine
with a magnificent mixture of the visceral and the metaphysical, with
cinematography, colours, costumes and set design taken from a masterpiece.
Argento and the lesser gialli creators,
Jean Rollin with his erotic horror, the expansion of an intellectual SF, started
and inspired Tarkovsky, all paved the way for Possession, a still unrivalled
study of a marital break-up, thrown in the middle of political turmoil in
divided cold war Berlin. Still, Possession had a special “career” in the UK, if by career we understand horrible reception, extremely negative reviews and eventually putting it to the ‘video nasties’ list of banned films. “Film nobody likes”, it was deemed too arty for the flea pits and too trashy and vulgar for the art house.
Today perhaps we
can’t imagine what it was like to live in a city surrounded by barbed wire and
under a constant look of armed guards. When we first see Anna, played by a disturbingly
pale, un-Holy Mary-like Adjani and Mark (Sam
Neill), we instantly see something is terribly wrong: their windows are under
constant scrutiny, and surrounded by wire – the symbol of political oppression
just as of the marital prison, of conventional life.
Mark’s job is not
what it seems – he has completed a secret government mission, which he wants
nothing to do with anymore. Meeting with mysterious grey-suited men, it’s clear
he's involved in high rank espionage. Anna can’t explain what is driving her
towards the mysterious lover. She wears her deep blue, up-to-neck gown of a 19th
century governess, which walks her through all kinds of atrocities as if
untouched, as if it’s a secret armor.
The Berlin U-bahn
is a character in its own right, scene of her neurotic commutes to the fatal
flat on another end of Kreuzberg, again, by the wall, with screaming dramatic
graffiti: FREIE WEST and MAUER MUST GO (despite location in the east, it was
still included in the West), and in its underpasses is the most terrifying
scene of her possession, where she issues green-yellow gunk among terminal gargles. In all this there's a place for comic relief: the whole
character of lusty Margie, played by one of iconic RW Fassbinder’s actresses Margrit
Carstensen and her comical enormous leg in plaster, just as her failed courtship
of Mark; in one of Zulawski's turns of surreal genius, when a stupor-ridden Adjani is on the tube, she's
robbed of a bunch of bananas by a homeless man, who takes one and gently puts
the rest back to her bag. Luxury goods were an issue in the East, mind you.
The demon can be
many things: her anxieties, her neuroses that took the shape of an
evil monster. The monster can be also simply a misogynistic punishment for the
unfaithful Zulawski’s wife. A chronically decaying demon, built out of corpses,
can be also a sum of the traumas his generation had to go through. It is common
to say of JG Ballard that everything he ever written, wore the shadow of the scenes
he saw in a concentration camp in war-ridden Shanghai . Similarly, it is believed of Roman
Polanski, that all his films, revolving around pain, trauma, sickly sexuality
and claustrophobia, reveal the daily atrocities he saw as a child in the Cracow ’s ghetto. There’s
no doubt Zulawski also went through traumatic childhood experiences, motives of which he obsessively came back to throughout all his career: war, isolation, madness realising in taboo eroticism, violence, evisceration, Polish romanticisme fou and our tragic history. Born in Lvov, Ukraine (then Poland) in 1940, he barely
survived the war, witnessing the destruction of the city and his family at a
very early age. In Possession we observe a growing hostility of the spouses, a decay of the family, of the city, and of the world.
Most of Zulawski’s
and some Polanski’s films, like Repulsion, Cul de Sac, Locataire (The Tenant),
all associate eroticism with perversion and anomaly, and fetishism, in a
genuinely surrealist way. Sex is creepy, sex involves an exchange of ugly
secretions, preceding of our inevitable decay; in fact, sex is a delight in
revulsion, in humiliation, in turning to rot, to a corpse, an acceptance not only of dying, but
also of dying disgustingly.
Also, due to the
amusing, pretty-ugly soundtrack of Andrzej Korzynski (rereleased recently, significantly, by English afficionados), the tale gains the feel
of deceit and malice and of a childish game at once: music is here at the same
time parodic and deadly serious. Korzynski had a longstanding relation to two Polish directors: the great Andrzej Wajda and to Zulawski, which can be
compared to the greatest director-composer couples in cinema: Leone-Morricone, Argento-Goblin/Morricone,
Fellini and Rota . In Third Part of the Night it was more art and free rock and prog - a bricoleur, it's clear he was taking from wherever he could. Some of his musique concrete experiments are also perhaps due to the influence of Polish Radio Experimental Studio (featured a lot before on my blog), and people like Wlodzimierz Kotoński. In Possession, he takes
those typically romantic styles, like tango or waltz, and turns them upside down;
similarly, he takes a children’s ditty motif, played on a broken harpsichord,
and twists it with sardonic, scary undertones, like a parody of a cheap Hollywood film noir. Every romantic illusion, fantasy of a
nice, unproblematic life, must be turned upside down and rear its disgusting head to us in the end. The
motifs come back on a loop, signifying the hopeless routine, in which the life
of Mark and Anna has hung, and how terrible the way out of it must be.
Anna’s ‘nymphomania’ can be also explained by her lack of orgasm. The whole film revolves around
her lack of pleasure, or in general, woman's incapability to get an orgasm from
the men that surround her. her craving for the beast is a typical freudian case of women's narcissism grew out of imprisonment and solitude (much like the aristocrat in Borowczyk's Beast, who also craved a monster as a source of unbelievable ecstasy). 'Almost' we hear from Anna each time she has sex
with her husband, with a tragic facial expression, typically, almost feeling
sorry for him, not for herself. Woman blames herself for the lack of
orgasm, never her lover. Neill is in his role often disarmingly, charmingly naive: he's chasing his wife, this woman, whom he doesn't understand a bit, always several steps behind her, disoriented. I'm sure this way Zulawski wanted to suggest who is in fact the vulnerable sex, cheated by the deceitful womanhood. As a proof of that, we have also Anna's double, their son's teacher, like in many other films (Third part of the night), replacing the (dead) Anna, who's less demanding in bed.
Anna is
disintegrating, her self being gradually possessed by demons: with her body
becoming lifeless like a marionette, sleepwalking through the besieged city,
unable to control, shaken by one shrill after another, obsessed with bodily
mutilation (never has an electric knife and kitchen automat meant so much in
the marital drama). She’s breeding her monster on her neurosis, guilt and
repulsion (like Catherine Deneuve keeping a dead rabbit in the fridge in
Polanski's eponymous film). I always actually thought monster is primarily an idea, Anna's punishment that turns into flesh. A fallen from grace housewife and mother, living on
sex like a vampire lives on blood, driven to madness by the increasingly mad
Berlin, Anna falls out of her previous gender roles, challenges all the cliches of a woman of her class or position and mocks the spectacle. The only healthy products
she keeps in her fridge now are the macabre heads and body-parts of her victims.
It’s a story of a woman who stops controlling herself: stops controlling her
libido (then of course she must fail as a mother), stops controlling her mind
(madness ensues), then stops controlling her body – and then her fluids start
to flow freely regardless of decorum: a dress is torn, a woman fucks an
octopus, a woman expels vomit, yellow prenatal waters and finally the foetus,
shaken, in a shocking scene, through all her orifices.
And then there’s the characteristic
claustrophobia of all the interiors, as if the closeness of the eastern border
and the restriction by the wall, especially felt in Kreuzberg district, caused
a specific Island Fever mentality (Insellkoller). Polanski’s Locataire
(together with Last Tango in Paris and Possession forming a great trilogy about the madness induced by the claustrophobic bourgeois tenements), tells a
story of a man growingly assuming the identity of a previous female tenant, who
killed herself (it’s also starring Adjani against her emploi as an
unattractive, bespectacled woman who grows friendly with Polanski’s character).
Similarly, Anna’s monster belongs to the insalubrious, skanky place of their
love, feeding on as on the negative aura surrounding the place, just like the blood
and the headless bodies she brings him. Zulawski had a proper budget behind him, so it is funny and telling, that the beast was made by the special FX specialist Carlo Rambaldi, known mostly for his outstanding work for Ridley Scott's Alien (as well as Argento's Profondo Rosso then he went on to model the little body of E.T., amazingly) and it would be tempting to compare Alien in Possession because of the role of women in it and in many other ways.
The glass-blue eyes of Isabelle Adjani
seem to tell the truth beyond recognition, beyond understanding…She knows that
the only way through the cold war of Europe
and of her own marriage is to live it, become like them: crazy.
All this to the accompaniment of the melody
of sardonic music box, deriding the characters. The queasy, sickly and morbid ditty, it owes a lot to Polish Jazz and Komeda’s
deliberately frantic note and soundtracks to
Lenica and Borowczyk’s animated films, House or Labyrinth, or Polanski’s Cul de
Sac with its fucked up little organ melody in a false key, just as the cheap soundtrack to horror movies. They all belong to
something that could be called a Polish surrealist tradition, similar to the
experimental Czech cinema. But it's synth drivennes is another issue entirely, taking from the italo disco frenzy of the era, Giorgio Moroder's Munich Machine.
The genius of
Possession is that it's at least three films at once. On the surface it is a
horror movie, if slightly metaphysical, a giallo with images terrifying beyond
comprehension, with a monster, cannibalism, blood, forbidden sexuality, macabre
murders, corpses etc. On another level it is a marital break-up drama, much in
the style of many Bergmans, like Scenes from a Marriage or From the Life of Marionettes,
with spouses self-harming, hurting and humiliating each other. But that still
wouldn’t explain why they act the way they act, at least if we won’t accept the
rule of exploitation: there's no rules, and a plot of no plot. Here, a plot
there definitely is, and it develops with the inevitability of Greek tragedy.
Because another level of this drama is a political movie, set in the key city
of international secret services and a scene of ideological war. Anna and Mark
may live the relatively privileged life of Berlin expats, in their nice low rise
modernist flat, but are still subject to increasing alienation and isolation, harrassed
by men of mystery in ridiculous pink socks.
Trouble with
sexuality pervades the whole film – woman's sexuality, the murder of a
homosexual couple, Anna's previous lover ridiculed as an amateur of tantric sex
and martial arts, and all this finalizing in a third world war-verging plot. Early 1980s were the era of a 'second cold war' entering a new
phase, a nuclear crisis which could lead to 3rd WW, implied by the
final carnage between the secret services and the aftermath. Extremely theatrical, like a lot of the rest of the film, it's very
much in the 'postmodern' style of the French Neobaroque. To me, Possession is one
of the most prophetic movies for the 1980s, predicting the Polish Martial Law
of the 1981 (it premiered a few months before) and the great depression that followed.
Zulawski's genius was to
see the personal drama as political, and the visceral and the sexual as coming
from the social and political oppression. Incredibly stylish, modern, haunted with
beauty and austerity, it's a world torn between Marx and Coca-cola (with Anna
in one scene smashing the portraits of the classics of Marxism) and Zulawski is
not necessarily a Marxist. The choices of many in that generation, and later -
which they made as soon as capitalism entered Poland - wore serious traces of
reacting over a trauma. Still, Zulawski remains a Romantic: revealing that love
is the darkness, against the common, desexualized, sanitized convictions within
capitalism.
Sunday, 17 February 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











